Tuesday, 14 July 2026

Terry Real: Us

 Contents

Chapter 1 Which Version of You Shows Up to Your Relationship? 1

Chapter 2 The Myth of the Individual 3

Chapter 3 How Us Gets Lost and You and Me Takes Over 5

Chapter 4 The Individualist at Home 8

Chapter 5 Start Thinking Like a Team 9

Chapter 6 You Cannot Love from Above or Below 10

Chapter 7 Your Fantasies Have Shattered, Your Real Relationship Can Begin 11

Chapter 8 Fierce Intimacy, Soft Power 13

Chapter 9 Leaving Our Kids a Better Future 16

Chapter 10 Becoming Whole 16

Epilogue: Broken Light 17


Chapter 1 Which Version of You Shows Up to Your Relationship?

It has been said that there are two types of couples in the world—those who fight and those who distance.

But in order to be present with your partner, you must yourself be in the present, not saturated by your past.

Avoidance learnt by modelling growing up, or by a relationship that was controlling.

 

Adaptive Child fixers are fuelled by an anxious, driven need to take anyone’s tension away from them as quickly as possible. Their motto is “I’m upset until you’re not.”

 

One of the telltale characteristics of the you and me Adaptive Child is that it is automatic, a knee-jerk response.

 

Relational heroism: when every sinew of your being says do the old thing, and you do the new instead.  You move from you and me consciousness to Us.

Non triggered us consciousness wise adult.

We want to move from reactionary individuals (you didn’t give me what I want, gave me what I don’t) to relational teammates: relational mindfulness.

 

In your close relationships, urgency is your enemy, and breath is your friend.

 

Chapter 2 The Myth of the Individual

Individual comes from indivisible, like atom\cell etc I guess.

Rubber hand: stroke it with your hand unseen, you will feel ownership of the rubber hand as yours

Bateson, blindman and stick, stick part of his mind.

Effects of the past, before you act on the past because of x, get a photo look at them, and say to yourself its more important for me to be like you than my partner is.

 

Minds and CNS exist in social context, our relationships, affect our immune system, and our emotions.

Still face, Ed Cronick, PCG and baby play, then PCG still face, infant, tries to elicit behaviour, seduce behaviour, and then protests

 

Reciprocity between PCG and infant produces oxytocin, cements the relationship

Messiness of relationship Disharmony, repair, harmony

 

Dysregulation 2 ways, frazzled mum, glares at child, child not getting what they want protests.

Infant regulates parents, you’re as happy as your least happy kid.

Closer relationships closer mimicry. Rats in pain, will copy licking behaviour.

Exert as little energy as possible whilst still staying alive: law of the jungle: economy of action

 

PFC off loads jobs to habit, to other parts of the CNS, to do things automatically, we also offload processing to other people! Eg Co regulation

Our brains assume we are in a rich environment where tasks are spread out in the group, I tend the fire, you are on lookout.

 

PFC slow down on interaction with others.

Having a human connection leads to group mind, reduces distress, that can be stranger, friend or partner. Increasing analgesic.

However we marry our unfinished business, a partner will press every button we have.

 

Relational consciousness moves us from individual dominion to collective humility; we are part of a large system.

 

As with climate disaster, it happens in relationship where reactive parts of the brain take over, and that is precisely the model we revert to: “I’m right, and you’re wrong. You win, and I lose. I can let you in, or I can protect myself.” The real question is how we as a team are going to deal with this in a way that works for both of us.

 

Domestic life plays out on a small stage full of gigantic emotions.

There is no place for objective reality in personal relationships. Useful to get trains running on time, but in a relationship leads to objectivity battles.  Like a dog chasing its tail. Here you have a negotiation of two subjective realities.

Like so many of the men I treat, Stan was being instrumental. His focus was on the task at hand, not on the subjective feelings of his partner. He was looking after her; he was not attending to her emotional needs.

 

Do you want to be right, or do you want your wife to feel better.

 

“I’m sorry you felt bad. I didn’t mean to make you feel that way. Is there anything I can say or do right now that would help you feel better?”

 

The problem is that their model of resolution is to come to agreement—

But you live in a relational world, of two subjective realities not one objective one.  The resolved world is owned by one person but not how both people see the world.

 

Remedial empath: think before you speak what it’s going to be like for the person you’re speaking to, to hear it.

 

your relationship is your emotional biosphere; It’s the environment we live in and depend upon. Sure, you can choose to pollute your biosphere over here with a flare-up of temper. But you’ll breathe in that pollution over there in the form of your partner’s withdrawal.

 

Chapter 3 How Us Gets Lost and You and Me Takes Over

 

There’s a spiritual principle at work here: to move beyond some part of you, you must first get to know it and ultimately befriend it.

He sees himself, in triggered moments, as an aggrieved party. He is a professional angry victim. The idiot at the checkout line, with his lackadaisical tempo, made him late. The moron who picked him up at the airport kept him waiting for fifteen minutes and barely spoke English. The lid on the mayonnaise jar thwarted him by not unscrewing. Daniel moves through an adversarial world out to get him. But man, he goes down swinging.

 

offending from the victim position.3 When we offend from the victim position, we feel like a victim while acting like an offender. “You hurt me, so I get to hurt you back twice as much. And I have no shame or compunction about what I’m dishing out because you victimized me.”

What is your dysfunctional stance, your adaptive child, victim, martyr, tyrant?

Where was it learnt, who did you see do this, what did it do to you, who did you do it to and no one stopped you.

Kids are like gas they grow to the container they are in. If no one stopped them then, then they will act like that now.

Abandoned is a child ego state, if I’m abandoned, I die. Adults, get left, rejected etc but they will survive.

 

Maturity comes when we tend to our inner children and don’t inflict them on our partners to care for.

 

Vertical line is self-esteem, too much, too little

Horizontal lines are boundaries too many, not enough

Trauma by abandonment or by intrusion.

 

Parental nurturing

Were you physically, intellectually, emotionally, sexually nourished.

Passive trauma is like water on a rock

 

Health is in the centre. Healthy transactions leave the child feeling neither superior nor inferior to anyone else. That’s healthy self-esteem.

False empowering:

Make the child the family star.

Enmeshment: parent uses the child whilst elevating you understand me more than your mother does.

Children are naturally grandiose and selfish and this needs to be moderated by an adult.

him. “If you want to do exactly what you want to do, be alone. The minute you let somebody into your world; you have to at least pay some attention to what they want to do.”

 

Some injurious transactions are clear examples of disempowerment (You little shit!) while others are clear examples of false empowerment (You’re the only good thing in my life!). But most relational trauma empowers and disempowers at the same time.

When a parent elevates a child and at the same time uses them, we call that enmeshment.

It’s typical to resist intrusion or neglect while simultaneously internalizing it: you take in the dysfunctional ways you and the world were seen. Those two forces—reaction and modelling—combine to forge your Adaptive Child.

 

 

In reaction mode, our Adaptive Children tend to do the opposite of what we ourselves experienced. Intrusion breeds walls. Abandonment breeds intrusion.

Freud regarded all neurotic symptoms as compromises between the expression and repression of illicit impulses.

 

               Many children face a different response from each parent. In those instances, the child chooses.

 

Chapter 4 The Individualist at Home

Rugged individualism, Hobbes, Locke, enlightenment, American constitution and French revolution. The government serves the individual

The individual born with unalienable rights, life, liberty the pursuit of happiness.

Aristocracy links everyone bottom to top.

Democracy breaks the link and says everyone can do their own thing. 

Pre WW2 a rational individualism, then post Goethe, a romantic individualism, i.e. led by passion\emotion.

If the Enlightenment individual thought, the Romantic individual felt.

 

 grandiose women have advanced degrees in offending from the victim position: “You hurt me, so I have no shame or compunction about hurting you twice as hard back because, after all, I’m your victim.”

Rugged individualism: don’t tell me what to do, unfair in my eyes is awful: big government.

Romantic individualism: I must be free to express myself, share myself, manifest my full potential. Authenticity is the big item, being dominated is the worst.    

rugged individualism has become the modern right, while expressive Romantic individualism has become the modern left.

In the absence of any objective criteria of right and wrong, good or evil, the self and its feelings become our moral guide … The right act is simply the one that yields the agent the most exciting challenge or the most good feeling about himself.24 … Utility replaces duty; self-expression unseats authority. “Being good” becomes “feeling good.”

 

The extension of individualism is loneliness.

In a couple if one loses we all lose.

 

Chapter 5 Start Thinking Like a Team

When you see yourselves as two distinct individuals, when you are in you and me consciousness, you are pulled into a linear control model. Either Rick controls Joanna, or she controls him. When

Angry complaint is not seductive, playing the victim in sexual desire.

Standing up for your rights but cutting your throat

I need sex

I need a clean house

We both deserve a good sex life

We both deserve a nice place to live in what do we need to do to achieve that.

When you feel safe, you can be wise.

Believing in essentialism gives away your power, you want something from your partner, they have the control and even with a gun you can’t make them do it, as they may prefer to die. But if you see yourself relationally you can affect them. You can change yourself and that can affect your partner and they will change, as you are a team, an interwoven duo.

 

There’s an old saying in family therapy that most couples have the same fight over forty years. Why? Because they fight the caricatures of their partners.  Core Negative Image are exaggerated caricatures; there is a grain of truth and a deep exaggeration.

The more you fight your partners core negative image, the more theirs gets entrenched. The way to do it is to relax, admit and apologise for the grain of truth in it.

 

Trend thinking (she always, he never) and from there to Essential character (she just is cold, he just is a child).

 

Functional actions in a relationship are moves that empower your partner to come through for you. Dysfunctional actions are those that render your partner paralyzed. In

The farther from the particular the more impotent your partner will feel.  Macro level analysis is fine, but just not in the heat of the moment.

 

 But don’t try to grapple with relational issues from your Adaptive Child. Get yourself reseated in your Wise Adult before attempting repair.

 

If your agenda in that moment is to be right, to gain control, to vent, retaliate, or withdraw—then stop, call a formal time-out, if need be, and get yourself recentred.

What’s the more and more pattern. The more man does x, the more the woman does y.

 

Passive-aggression, acts out the feelings he doesn’t address,

 

redistribution.5 You take a quality that is supposedly lodged in one person—like badness—and you move it around.

Negative image, overly dramatic\emotional, exaggerating, scared, overly protective, messy, lacks care.

 

Chapter 6 You Cannot Love from Above or Below

You can be better at something than someone, but you are not a better person. You both have the same rights from a democratic point of view, one vote, the law applies equally to both of you. (Although money is affecting both of these principles)

Culture rewards competition, me and you, individualism and your adaptive child.

Successful in your one up career, disaster in your one down marriage.

We all marry our unfinished business.

 

Remember, two paths of internalization form the Adaptive Child. One of them, reacting, tends toward resistance. But the other pathway is modelling, and often, unconsciously, we model ways of being in the world that we consciously despise.

Be close to a person who can’t be close to them by modelling them

Shame you know you’re in it as it hurts, Grandiosity you don’t as it feels good.

 

Remember, two paths of internalization form the Adaptive Child. One of them, reacting, tends toward resistance. Bruce’s drive to succeed where his father had so spectacularly failed—his drive to resist his father’s fate—fuelled his workaholism. But the other pathway is modelling, and often, unconsciously, we model ways of being in the world that we consciously despise.

 

The emotion driving both shame and grandiosity is contempt.

 

“Does what I’m about to say fall below the level of basic respect?” If you judge what you’re about to say as disrespectful, I have great advice for you. Shut up.

If you’re down, in your mind’s eye you literally reach down with your arms and scoop yourself back up into same-as,

If you’re up, reach up and pull yourself down. Pia Mellody gave us a mantra to use for this moment: “Each person has inherent worth. No one more than. No one less than.”

You are perfectly imperfect, as pia melody would say      

When a client shifts from shamelessness to toxic shame, they move from one form of self-preoccupation to another. You’re still preoccupied with yourself, even if you’re telling yourself that you’re a terrible person.

 

“A boy’s question to the world is: ‘What do you have for me?’ A man’s question is: ‘What does this moment demand of me? What do I need to give?’”

Once you let go of hubris, you can relax. You’ll find you’re more able to let things emerge, hear other voices, listen for the unsaid.

You’ll begin to develop, at any age, the basic trust that psychologists would wish you to have in your twos and threes, the simple trust that things will work out on their own without the stamp of your will.

 

Chapter 7 Your Fantasies Have Shattered, Your Real Relationship Can Begin

Harmony, then disharmony, then repair is the essential rhythm of all close relationships. It’s like walking. You have your balance, then you stumble. You catch yourself and rebalance.

Trauma as shattering your assumptions in life that made you safe, if this has gone what else.

 

love addicts simply move from one honeymoon phase to another, after the real people show up

 

Honeymoon phase=>Mundane phase

You hoped your partner would heal you.

You hoped your partner would agree to the unspoken marital contract; they don’t.

The person you let in closest is the person that hurts you most.

 

In family therapy, we are taught to think of couples as having a “marital contract,” usually unspoken.

 

Falling in love means that whether you acknowledge it or not, you think, with this person I will be healed, or at the very least I will avoid and compensate for my earliest lacks and injuries.

 

Affairs are flattering, new, exciting, sexually pleasurable. We ask someone why they don’t cheat. What makes someone say no?”

 

The unfaithful partner has insufficient constraints in themselves. In other words, their selfishness trumps their relationality.

 

The relationship has become so unsatisfying—so contentious, or distant, or dead—that the cheater feels there isn’t enough worth protecting.

 

I call the harmony phase of a relationship love without knowledge; I call the disharmony phase knowledge without love. Now you know exactly and precisely all your partner’s flaws and blemishes. You see them all. But you don’t love your partner very much. You are utterly in you and me consciousness, facing an adversary, fighting for your psychological survival.

 

Empathy can heal, if indirectly. The best way to open another’s heart, it turns out, is to open your own.

 

harmony, disharmony, and repair.

which gives her a sense of resiliency. Listen, all ye anxious helicopter parents: resilience originates not in the absence of disharmony and discord but in its survival in you as a pair.

 

The neuroscientist Stephen Porges posits that feeling safety in another person with whom we interact consists of two important qualities—the absence of an agenda, and the absence of judgment. I will neither intrude nor disappear.

In mainstream individualist culture, our relationship to relationships is passive. We get what we get and react.

 Disharmony is to your relationship as pain is to your physical body.

you and me consciousness knows just what to do in times of disharmony:

(1) wrap yourself in rightness

(2) attempt to control your partner

(3) give vent to every emotion and infraction

(4) retaliate

 (5) shut down—or some combination of all five of these losing strategies.

 

We stand grounded in the humility of our own imperfections. Who are we to get high and mighty? The poet W. H. Auden wrote in his beautiful poem, “As I Walked Out One Evening”: “You shall love your crooked neighbour / With your crooked heart.”

 

Chapter 8 Fierce Intimacy, Soft Power

They never went from harmony through disharmony to repair. Instead, they went from harmony to each his own corner.

 

A good woman lives to serve others. But a man, like Phil, has no voice either. With the exception of a supposedly ever-ready lust, a strong man should have no emotional needs, certainly nothing vulnerable.

 

Fierce Intimacy

Fierce intimacy is the essential capacity to confront issues, to take each other on.

Aim for bland harmony but no intimacy, which requires relational rupture and repair

Affair as narcissistic entitlement or getting some vitality back.

Fighting couple, re-find what was good

Distant couple, work through their arguments to rejoin.

Do you tend toward fighting or towards distance? Do you need to find more constructive ways to talk to one another—less blaming and criticizing and more humble sharing of your own experience along with real curiosity about the experience of your partner? Or would a good fight, like a summer storm, shake a few leaves and clear the air?

I want that for them, both passion and stability. The challenge, of course, lies in having both in one relationship.

Dealing with each other. What does that phrase really mean? At its most basic, it signifies taking each other on. Airing your dissatisfactions, articulating your desires, making concrete suggestions about how things might work better for you, and then, if all goes well, working like a team to make things right. Repair demands assertion (not aggression) from the unhappy partner met with care and responsiveness (not defensiveness) in the other. There is a technology to repair,

First, repair is not a two-way street. Almost everyone gets this wrong. When you are faced with an upset partner, this is not your turn. This is not a dialogue. Liz doesn’t air all her grievances as an invitation for Phil to then air his. You must take turns.

Unhappy partner, deal with that. No objective facts, not about you, but about them, it’s their turn, they are in disharmony, and you get to get them to harmony. If they complain, this isn’t an invitation for you to complain, then you have two disharmonies.

Stay on your side of the street. Don’t accuse them—talk about yourself. Not “Liz, you’re avoidant,” but rather, “Liz, I don’t feel met.”

 

Janet hurleys feedback wheel

1. This is what I recollect happened.

2. This is what I made up about it.

3. This is what I felt. And that all-important fourth step most speakers leave out:

4. This would help me feel better.

 

Soft Power: Strong and Loving Simultaneously

Power with not power over

Dominance does not breed intimacy.

In the gender binary of patriarchy, affiliation is “feminine” and power is “masculine.” Cooperation is nowhere in sight.

I want us to blow up the gender binary, moving beyond the false dichotomy of power or belonging.

Soft power: By asserting in virtually the same breath his own needs and also the value of our connection,

There’s an old cliché in family therapy: one partner talks to the other in order to get them into bed with them. The other partner drags them into bed in order to get them to talk.

Soft power. When you need to speak up, be artful. Take care of your partner as best you can by explicitly cherishing them and your relationship.

If that is not your intention, you are probably in your Adaptive Child. Stop! Take a walk around the block, journal, and splash some water on your face. This won’t go well until you are self-regulated.

 

If that is not your intention, you are probably in your Adaptive Child. Stop! Take a walk around the block, journal, and splash some water on your face. This won’t go well until you are self-regulated.

 

Feedback wheel

1.       what happened

2.        what you made up about it

3.        how you felt about it

4.       what you’d like now.

When you share your feelings, skip over the emotion that first comes to you, your go-to emotion, and lead with others.

if you are used to leading with big, powerful feelings, like anger, or indignation, soften up—reach for and lead with your vulnerability.

 

Changing your stance changes the dance between you.

Detach from the outcome, you did a fine job of speaking, your outcome will vary dependent on the day, but you’re not in charge of that

Be specific, don’t go for trend or character. General makes you helpless, makes it dirtier, more of an insult.

Apologies get more powerful going up from specific to trend.

Respond with what you can do, not what you can’t.

Don’t discount your partners repair, let it happen, not I don’t believe you.

 

“Tone trumps content.” Tone reveals which part of your brain you’re in, us consciousness or you and me consciousness.

 

Chapter 9 Leaving Our Kids a Better Future

There’s an old line in AA: “Pass it back or pass it on.”

Was one of your parents intrusive? In reaction, you erect thick protective walls. Was someone controlling? In reaction, you develop a black belt in evasion. Were they needy? You become expert in giving care.

 For many clients, keeping spiritual company with their problematic beloved parent is their only way of feeling close to the parent.

 

Desiree and Juan: “You Cannot Rage at My Husband”

Chapter 10 Becoming Whole

Narcissism: outside in self-esteem, performance, what other thinks, what you possess, being better than others at being

Self-esteem: inside out selfself-esteem, I value myself, care for myself

Passive aggressive: put out a stink, punish people by what you don’t do

the simplicity of the three family roles first described in AA: hero child, scapegoat child, lost child.

You grew up good, and you grew up hungry.”

“Emotionally alone,” I correct. “Psychologically alone.”

 “You really can’t be mad at not getting what you never asked for.”

We will never experience collective healing until we undo the dissociation and compartmentalization that is required of us to do collective harm.

Everyone thinks themselves in a group that is better than some people worse than another: we have never been a lonelier people.

Intimacy is not some blended egoless amalgam. Intimacy is an endless dance of I and US, the needs of each vital part of the relationship called myself or yourself as those individual wants filter through the needs of the relationship itself.

 

Epilogue: Broken Light

Individualism bids us to see ourselves as separate and dominant. Ecology, relationality, invites us to see ourselves as neither dominating nor dominated but part of.

Couples: some have too weaker skin and they are too reactive, so you can thicken their boundaries. Some have to thicker boundaries and they have no connection, so you need to weaken their boundaries.

 

              


Friday, 22 June 2018

Hold me Tight Sue Johnson

Hold me Tight Sue Johnson
Contents
Introduction 2
Love=a revolutionary new view 2
A new theory of attachment 2
Where did our love go? Losing connection 3
Primal Panic 3
Demon dialogues 4
Key moments of attachment and detachment 4
Emotional responsiveness: the key to a lifetime of love 5
Seven transforming conversations 6
Protest Polka 7
Demon Dialogue 3 Freeze and Flee 8
Conversation 2 Finding the raw spots 8
Identifying raw spots 9
Vulnerability dance 9
Conversation 3 Revisiting a rocky moment 10
De-escalating disconnection 10
Recognise your impact on your partner 11
Play and practice 11
Conversation 4 Hold me tight: Engaging and connecting 11
What am I most afraid of 11
Play and practice 11
What do I need most from you? 11
Conversation 5 Forgiving injury 12
Six steps to forgiveness 12
Play and practice 13
Conversation 6 Love and bonding 13
Sealed off sex 14
Solace sex 14
Synchrony sex 14
Play and practice by yourself 14
Play and practice with your partner 15
Conversation 7 keeping love alive 15
Danger points 15
Celebrate positive moments 15
Marking moments of separation and reunion 15
Creating a resilient relationship story 15
Create a future love story 16
Holding on to positive change, creating new models 16
Play and Practice 16

Introduction

Couples interactions as emotional not intellectual, you can’t bargain for connection or compassion
An emotional relationship is a safe emotional connection, it is the secure base.  The loved one gives reliable emotional connection and comfort, it is a replaying of self as child with primary care giver.
EFT: you are emotionally dependent on your partner for soothing, nurturing and protection.  Adult attachment is just more reciprocal than childhood attachment.

EFT creates and strengthens the emotional bond, it does this by enhancing attuning and responsivity.

Love=a revolutionary new view

We live in the shelter of the other=Celtic saying
What is love?
A mutually beneficial alliance: a cold-blooded give and get?
A mechanism to ensure gene production?
Social capital has currently reduced, i.e. how connected we are in a beneficial way to our society, how much society cares.  Lower levels of close friendship.  We now ask for emotional connection and sense of belonging.  from our partner that we used to from a whole village.  Love has also become culturally the new reason for life and has reached dizzying heights of what you should expect and its importance.
Love provides as haven to rear children and a bulwark against the vicissitudes of existence.  We would have no children without the haven of love, as we need many years until they become independent, frogs have none.

A new theory of attachment

Without love you can be physically healthy but indifferent, callous and unable to relate to others.
Bowlby, evolution=>keep precious others close aids survival.
A child’s distress at separation from parents, its needs for connection and comfort
Four behaviours basic to attachment
1.       Monitor and maintain closeness to beloved
2.       Reach out for care giver when distressed
3.       Miss the care giver when apart
4.       We can count on that person when we go out into the world to explore

Strange situation=kids who are angry on mother return have unpredictable mums, kids who are distant on return have distant mums,

Bowlby argued that adults have the same need for attachment as children
Previous views on love: as altruistic, as disguised sexual infatuation.
Attachment theory of love as being safe with the other so you can go out and explore is against the values in society of independence and self-reliance.
Bowlby to turn to others for emotional support is a sign of strength?
Adults replay their childhood attachment behaviours with their partner, when away they miss, and can be less secure, and can be angry, avoidant or calm quickly on their return.
“research” shows: secure adult attachment: less reactive to conflict with partner, more supportive, and more able to ask for support. Secure attachment means we like ourselves more and understand others better.  More securely attached, more curious. Openness to new experience and flexibility of belief relates to secure attachment, Curiosity comes out of safety, rigidity out of being vigilant to threat.
So, curiosity comes when we feel safe, flexibility when we don’t feel under threat, open to new experience and beliefs again when we feel safe and connected, so compassion and attachment.

Where did our love go? Losing connection

The bottom of the iceberg is that a couple doesn’t feel safe, when they don’t feel safe certain things happen.  Their fights are protests, to hurt.
Their questions are do you value me, do you accept me, will you support me when I need you, do you need me?

Primal Panic

When our attachment bond isn’t there we feel alone and helpless.  If we are secure we can manage conflict, if we are not we are swamped by primal panic.
In the face of primal panic, we either become demanding or clingy to get reassurance and comfort from our partner or we withdraw to soothe and protect ourselves.  These strategies either say notice me, I need you. Or I won’t let you hurt me, I will comfort myself.
When a partner isn’t safe they become defensive.
In a relationship you are both care giver and care needed, sometimes you can get caught up in your own needs and forget your partners.
If we don’t feel secure with our partner, we can put out demands rather than requests which then result in us not getting what we need.

Demon dialogues

1.       Find the bad guy
a.       One: critical aggressive, Two defiant and defensive. Blame and withdraw, increasing as each side gets higher. Results in either blaming one or other partner or the relationship for why it is happening.
2.       Protest polka
3.       Freeze and flee
Dealing with disagreements via communication is like changing the dance steps when you need to change the music. The problem is a lack of emotional closeness and safety, they are not attached, they are not connected.

Key moments of attachment and detachment

The attachment alarm goes off when we feel a threat from the world, or a negative shift in connection from our loved one.
The attachment alarm goes if you think you are not valued, respected, or needed by the other and they aren’t three for you if you need them.
The other needs you
The other values you
The other will be there for you when you need them.
When it goes off you can attack as you feel hurt, or retreat, night of which help. But if you express the hurt you felt, you also express the need you have for the other, of course this needs to be expressed in a way that encourages the reconnection.  You also need to be sensitive to the other who is offering to reconnect connection bonds.  The more you try to control the more you fear the stability of your love.
Both sexes have the same attachment needs and fears but express them differently. When a relationship is in free fall then men complain of being rejected, inadequate and a failure, and women talk about feeling abandoned and unconnected.  When women are distressed they are better at tending and befriending and do reach out for oxytocin.
When marriages fail it is not increasing conflict that is the cause but rather lower emotional responsiveness and decreasing affection.

Emotional responsiveness: the key to a lifetime of love

Nothing brings people together like a common enemy, seeing the interaction as their problem not the last stroke helps.
Withdrawal and anger go together as connection is broken so withdraw to protect, then approach to get it back.
Distress always starts when one reaches for the other to make safe emotional contact but doesn’t get it. Ac

Couples fight for their lives when their emotional bond is threatened, as they will be isolated without support.
Basic aspects of emotional bond
1.       Do I matter to you (value, respect)?
2.       Are you there for me (will you support me)
3.       Will you come when I call (will you be responsive)
When a safe connection is lost, then couples go into a fight or flight mode.
Blaming and aggression at least gets a response, good way to manage withdrawal: but blame further distances and worsens the problem.
Withdrawal, close down and pretend not to care
Protesting is another response against the disconnection, again this drives the other further away.
Immobility is the response when feeling helpless.

Demon dialogue: blaming and a fear of rejection

The seven conversations to promote emotional bonds
1.       Accessibility: can I reach you
2.       Responsiveness: can I rely on you to respond to me emotionally
3.       Engagement: Do I know you value me and will stay close
First 3 conversations deescalate tension 4th transforms it, final 3 help keep out of the snares of disconnection.

1.       Demon Dialogues
a.       Notice how your response to your partner affects them and how their response affects you
b.       Ask what lies beneath this disagreement, what are you really saying
2.       Finding the raw spots
a.       What are the softer spots beneath the argument connected with attachment needs and fears
b.       Look under anger for upset
c.       Learn how to speak about them without pushing the other away
3.       Revisiting a rocky moment
a.       Leaning what happened to spot it again
4.       Hold me tight
a.       Transforms so that the partner, is more emotionally responsive, available and engaged with the other
5.       Forgiving injuries
6.       Bonding through sex and touch
7.       Keeping your love alive

Securely attached couples recognises each other’s attachment processes.

Seven transforming conversations


Deescalating conversations
1.       Demon dialogues
a.       Find the bad guy
                                                               i.      Mutual game of blame
b.       Protest polka
                                                               i.      Demand\withdraw, criticize\defend
c.       Freeze and flee
                                                               i.      Both step back
Two ways to manage when we want to hold onto our connection but are not feeling safe
1.       Numb our emotions and avoid engagement and to deny our attachment needs
2.       We can fight for recognition and response.

In attack and counter attack, we put our feelings aside until we can’t connect with them.
Attack is self generating, the more you attack, the more dangerous you seem the more I attack\defend. However, the way to look at this is the accuser accused pattern is the bad guy, neither one of you.
“ContentTube” = partners go into detailed example to try to prove their point, and support their blame
Attack goes with attack\defend\withdraw
Protest goes with withdraw or ignore
Showing the other is at fault, prove the other wrong just pushes you apart
As you prove the other the bad guy, how does each of you see the other in the process? The bully?  The idiot? How do you describe the relationship?

Protest Polka

Demand-Withdraw or Criticize-Defend.
Freeze or flee.
Attachment relationships are the only ties on earth where are response is better than none.  Protest polka is about getting a response that reassures.
Protest polka one person is demanding, actively protesting the disconnection and explicitly criticising, the other withdrawing (implicitly protesting). So, one tries to change the behaviour of the other the other withdraws. In some ways the demand is for connection, the result is withdrawal. The demand might start to help the relationship then it might move into just a response which is better than none.
The circle, there is demand, there is shut down, perceived as shut out, there is more demanding. Shut down as a protection against doing wrong, shut out, then more demands 

When less distressed then
Disconnection
Soft and clear communication of this by a partner
Other partner more receptive

More distress
Disconnection
Distress and disappointment by a partner
Partner hears doom and indication of a failing relationship disconnects further

Stonewalling: lack of response: gets met with aggression to connect. Attack gets recognition, stonewalling denies it.
Relationship dance: Attack=defence and justification. Criticism=counter criticism. Blame=denial, excuse and re-blaming. Avoidance=>pursuing for connection. Criticism=>freezing, numbing and counter criticism
Protest polka as fighting for the relationship.
Withdrawal=partner shut out, excluded and abandoned.

Demon Dialogue 3 Freeze and Flee

If a relationship is a dance, then both are sitting out. Tension in the air, partners are frozen and numbed out to protect themselves from pain. Each is in self protection mode pretending they don’t feel or need
What can happen, aggressive partner can pursue, give up, go silent, will grieve the relationship and then leave.
Freeze and flee concerns the loss of relationship and a helplessness in terms of how to restore it.
Bowlby: we use the eyes of those we love to reflect our understanding of ourselves.
When we become disconnected we act like we did when we were children.

Play and practice
Fill in
When you x then I don’t feel safely connected to you
I tend to y, to manage difficult feelings in the relationship, I do this in a hope of z
As this pattern keeps going I feel x
What I say to myself about this relationship is y
The more I y the more you
Maybe we can warn each other


Conversation 2 Finding the raw spots

Vulnerability: emotionally naked, unprotected. Most of us have sore spots, that are deeply painful when touched.  When this is activated we can move into demon dialogues.
Raw spot:  a place of hyper sensitivity where attachment needs haven’t been met and have been repeatedly ignored, rejected or dismissed, leading to someone feeling emotionally deprived or deserted.
So, a raw spot
Gets activated
Powerful emotions via memories, or via connection to current concerns
Relational difficulty and both parties confused.
Blame is put on the raw spot partner and back to demon dialogues
Possibly rubs against the sore spot of the other, and back to demon dialogues.
Withdrawal and rage are the hallmarks of demon dialogues and hide our vulnerability of emotional disconnection of sadness, fear, and shame.

Raw spots
See them in action as
1.       Rapid change in emotion
2.       Disproportionate emotional reaction
3.       There is a strong somatic reaction
a.       When we are afraid blood flows into the legs
b.       When we are angry blood flows into the hands
4.       We get ready, ready to act
a.       Fear: flight or freeze
b.       Anger: fight
c.       Shame: hide
d.       Sadness: grieve and let go

Identifying raw spots

When you see a raw spot
What is the sense of relational disconnection
What is the trigger
What happens in your body
How do you interpret this?
How do you then act?
We live in a society where we are supposed to be strong and invulnerable, so we are less inclined to face our needs our sorrows, our softer feelings.  So, we can ignore or deny them.
Vulnerability seems to put the power into the hands of the person we show it to. Likewise, the vulnerability in our partner can be threatening, as we don’t know what to do, it can activate our own vulnerability, yet in a child we respond.
The emotions you deny in yourself are possibly hard to access in others as it might trigger your own, you need to defend yourself from yours and from the others.
To have a really secure bond you need to show it all your vulnerabilities and your strengths, if you ignore the former they can’t be tended to and they will continue.
Our attachment alarm system gets turned on by a deprivation of care, soothing, and comfort.
The second trigger to the attachment system, is a sense of emotional abandonment. So, either abandonment or deprivation can provoke a sense of helplessness.
A person’s problem in relationship can look for a relational solution, so withdrawal and a sense of abandonment, anger, which then provides a connection

Vulnerability dance

When I think of sharing my softest feelings with you here, it is hard to do. My worst fantasy is that what will happen is ________.
I moved in the dance by ________, and I felt ________.
When I heard/saw ________, I just felt ________.

When we get stuck in our cycle and I _________ (use an action word, e.g., push), I feel _________ (surface emotion). The emotional trigger for my sense of disconnection is when I see/sense/hear _________ (the attachment cue). On a deeper level, I am feeling _________.

Conversation 3 Revisiting a rocky moment

So secure couples can stand back see the problematic interaction, see their part in it, their partners and declare a cease fire, with the expectation that their partner will follow suit.
With a distressed couple this is much harder as the partner is seen as they enemy.
Success for a distressed couple
1.       Tread on each other toes and not go into demon dialogues
2.       Rub each other’s raw spots and not go into demon dialogues
3.       Be able to deal with the fact that their biggest fear and comfort is their partner.

De-escalating disconnection

1.       Name and stop the collective game
a.       Attack and defend, looks to blame, find the villain, uses I and your pronouns. Victory for one means defeat for the other, in time no one wins. Notice this and the spiral of disconnection that is happening
2.       Name your own moves
a.       I was complaining, what were you doing
3.       Name your own feelings
a.       Do it in parts, part of me is angry
4.       Owning how you contribute to your partners feelings
a.       Notice how our ways of dealing with our partner can knock them off balance and activate their attachment fears
5.       Asking about your partners deeper emotions
a.       In the row what raw spot is affected, what attachment vulnerability is touched. What are the softer feelings that are activated, what are the fears that are activated.
6.       Share your own deeper, softer feelings
7.       Standing together
a.       Generate a common cause and a common ground, make the dance difficulties, the relationship difficulties the common cause
Two parts of de-escalation:
1.       How a partner responds in conflict and attachment threat, has a big impact on the other partner
2.       A partner’s negative reaction can be their best way of dealing with attachment fears

One useful question to a couple can be for one to stand back and say what’s happening here
Fear narrows our perception, so we only see the scary.
Reacting harshly can give a sense of control when you feel helpless.
Complaints can get the other to take notice of you when you feel abandoned.

Recognise your impact on your partner

Pattern of you will listen to me, you can’t make me. So, loss of connection, criticise\complain, get some connection even if bad, get aggressive as the attention bond is threatened, and aggressively demand it back.
So, attachment threat, anger to retrieve it, withdrawal to manage it, stokes attachment threat more. 
Attachment threat=>aggressive protest=<withdrawal =++attachment threat.

Play and practice

1.       Each write down a brief description about the same difficult incident that happened 2-3 weeks ago
a.       What were the moves that you made and what were the moves your partner made
2.       Put in the feelings and how your feelings helped shape your partners
a.       What are the soft feelings, the raw spots that have been activated
3.       Given the information above how you would have stood together at the end of this incident
4.       Repeat on an unresolved task

Conversation 4 Hold me tight: Engaging and connecting

Conversations 1-3 stop the problems, conversations 4> improve the connection
Accessibility, responsiveness and engagement=ARE conversation
This conversation declares our core attachment fears

What am I most afraid of

Handles open doors, words and phrases can be handles to open different parts of ourselves.

Play and practice

Take a situation, work out what the worst about your fears is, say them to your partner, have your partner respond.

What do I need most from you?

This declares our core attachment needs.

Conversation 5 Forgiving injury

Sometimes small events can have grievous effects and they are held by partners. They are traumatic and turn our world upside down.
Hypervigilance, numbing, avoidance are all indicators of traumatic stress.
When there is urgent need for our partners support it is pass or fail, and if fail then this can wipe out many previous supportive incidents and also mean that there is reluctance to ask for support.
There is also betrayal if you ever loved me how could you do x..Not be there if I needed you, have an affair, treat me so unkindly, so there is a sense of abandonment.
Partners can create traumatic stress for their mate, as they don’t know how to manage themselves or their way of managing doesn’t attend to their mate.
Partners try to forget or bury traumas but that doesn’t work as it can for raw spots or everyday hurts.
To manage
1.       P1 Show hurt
2.       P2 Validate hurt
3.       P2 Empathy
4.       P2 remorse and guilt
5.       P1 Forgiveness
6.       P1 Reconciliation
7.       P1 Willingness to trust

Six steps to forgiveness

1.       Hurt partner speaks about their pain
a.       Aim to do this in how it was for you, rather than blaming. Use when then.  Allow the wound to be seen and acknowledged by the partner
2.       Injuring partner acknowledges the wound. Be empathic, understand how it is a wound for them.
a.       Injuring partner can retreat into shame and self-blame
3.       Partner says how they don’t want to do this again and takes active steps
4.       Injuring partner takes ownership
a.       I did this
b.       Validate their pain as legitimate
c.       Acknowledge how I created to this
d.       Express shame
5.       Injured party can express what they need right now to bring the trauma to a close
6.       A new narrative can be formed what happened, what its effects are, how the rupture was dealt with
a.       How to prevent future injuries
b.       How to live with any wound\vulnerability

You were sending out distress flares, I thought you were burning the house down.
Affairs that go a long time undermine our sense that we can be familiar and know our partner, therefore we can’t define our own reality.

Play and practice

1.       Think of a time when you were hurt by someone but not your partner
a.       What was the worst moment of it
b.       What conclusions did you draw about this person?
c.       What were you longing for
d.       What protective moves did you make
2.       Ask yourself
a.       Support
                                                               i.      Did I feel deprived of support?
                                                             ii.      Did my pain get dismissed?
b.       Was I devalued
c.       Was I taken advantage of
d.       Does my partner represent a danger to me?
3.       Reflect on how hard it is to apologise for your short comings
a.       Ways to avoid apologising
                                                               i.      4 second apology and what’s for dinner
                                                             ii.      Minimizing apology, well I did it but its explainable because
                                                           iii.      Forced apology, I guess I’m supposed to say sorry
                                                           iv.      Instrumental apology, I guess I need to say sorry or we will never.
4.       When have you hurt a loved one?
a.       Simple statements work
                                                               i.      I pulled away I let you down
5.       Now turn to a specific injury in your current relationship
a.       Vague hurts are difficult to work with
b.       Express what was needed
6.       Injuring partner explains how they came to hurt their partner
a.       Help make your actions more predictable
7.       Injuring partner
a.       Empathise with your partner for the injury they suffered
b.       Own what you did and apologise
8.       Injured party
a.       Can you accept the apology, so that you really understand what they did why, and to understand what they felt about it, contrition, embarrassment, guilt?


Conversation 6 Love and bonding

We waste time trying to find the perfect lover instead of trying to create the perfect love: Tom Robbins
We’ve been taught to see sex as an end in itself.
Emotional connection creates great sex and great sex creates emotional connection.
When you feel safe and secure you can adventure with sex.
Satisfied partner see sex as one source of intimacy.
Dissatisfied partners see sex as the main problem.  Sexual distress seems to be an indicator of other problems.

Sealed off sex

Reduces sexual tension, feel good about sexual prowess but isn’t intimate.  The focus is about sensation and performance. Practiced mostly by men.

Solace sex

We have this when we need reassurance we are valued and desired, the goal is to relieve attachment fears.

Touch hunger in men: sex and sport are where they are allowed to get it.
What demands do you place on sex? To show you are valued, to prove you have prowess, to allay your attachment needs? Too stronger burden on sex makes it harder.

The precious, only for you, only with you.

Synchrony sex

Where emotional and sexual connection come together. Uses attunement like a mother and baby do.
In a secure relationship the sexual excitement comes not from infatuated passion of first encounters but rather from the risk involved in staying open to moment to moment physical and emotional connection.
Most sexual problems in the northern hemisphere are low sexual desire in women and premature ejaculation in men or lax erections.  Women typically feel alone and disconnected, they either push for solace sex or shut down.  Passion is not a constant but waxes and wanes, with seasons, events, physical health
Accessibility, responsiveness, and engagement, an A.R.E. conversation.

Play and practice by yourself

1.       What does your sex life make you feel like?
2.       In bed with your partner do you feel safe and connected.
a.       What helps
b.       What hinders
3.       What is your dominant sexual style
a.       Sealed off
b.       Solace
c.       Synchrony
4.       What are your four most important expectations for sex?
5.       What would you put in your brief guide to being your lover

Play and practice with your partner

1.       How often do you need stellar sex?
2.       What do you do when sex isn’t working physically, or emotionally
3.       Write out if I was perfect in bed I could, and I would, and you would feel more
4.       Share 4 instances with your partner
5.       Tell your partner times when your sex with your partner was perfect

Conversation 7 keeping love alive

If you’re bored in marriage you’re not paying attention.
Heraclitus All things flow, nothing abides
Fear or marriage as habit and boredom, to an actively engaging with love, which either you can or not do.
Relapse prevention
1.       Danger points to demon dialogues
2.       Celebrate positive moments
3.       Plan rituals around separation and reunion
4.       Help each other identify attachment issues and work out how to defuse
5.       Create a resilient relationship story
6.       Create a future love story

Love as a continual story of making and losing connection.

Danger points

Work out where your relational triggers are into disconnection

Celebrate positive moments

Tell your partner when what they do or say creates a sense of belonging
What are the moments when you feel wanted, cared for, special

Marking moments of separation and reunion

Rituals provide the framework to community, they order the passing of time in terms of the community. Time is a community activity.


Creating a resilient relationship story

Emotional volatility can destroy a sense of history and the couples ability to write a consistent story line. We use stories to make sense of our lives. We use stories to guide our future.

Resilient relationship story gives details of how you were stuck in the mud but found ways to move out of that.

3 adjectives to describe your relationship when it was stalled
2 verbs that capture you moved in your negative dance and how you were able to change the pattern
key moment when you saw each other differently, acted differently and were able to reach out for each other
3 adjectives as to how you describe your relationship right now
1 thing you are doing to keep your connection

Create a future love story

Personal dreams for 5-10 years

Holding on to positive change, creating new models

How will you implement what you have learnt?

Play and Practice

1.       Are there any danger points in your relationship right now?
a.       Name the emotion
b.       How can your partner help with this?
2.       Can you identify small positive moments in your relationship?
a.       Does your partner know about these, if not tell them?
3.       Any relationship moments when it shifted to another level
4.       Do we have ritual for belonging, separating and union?
5.       Think of a problem-solving discussion that ends in frustration
a.       What are the attachment needs?
b.       How could you express them?
6.       Craft the beginnings of a resilient relationship story
a.       Find three words to describe your bond
7.       Create a future love story, the relationship you will have in 5-10 years.

a.       What can you do to take the first step towards it?